Search found 28378 matches

by Ha Tran
Fri Nov 13, 2015 12:32 am
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: Service PO Delivery Compl Indicator Usage
Replies: 6
Views: 4383

Re: Service PO Delivery Compl Indicator Usage

Hi,

When you are maintaining the SES (Service Entry Sheet), SAP provides you with the so-called ''Final Entry'' indicator and by setting this indicator, the DCI will be automatically updated in the Service PO. Isn't it what you are looking for?

Cheers,
HT
by Ha Tran
Tue Nov 10, 2015 3:06 am
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: Auto PO Marking
Replies: 1
Views: 1367

Re: Auto PO Marking

Hi, It is very much subject to which PRs shall be subject to ME59N batch job run. A typical example is that those PRs to which the outline agreements have been assigned will be converted automatically into PO. In this particular case, you have to define the new variant in ME57 transaction to exclude...
by Ha Tran
Thu Nov 05, 2015 1:04 am
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: Deleting a Characteristic Value - Material Class
Replies: 2
Views: 1865

Re: Deleting a Characteristic Value - Material Class

Hi,

You should remove the unwanted value from the release strategy assignment via CL20N transaction so that it won't be picked up in any release strategy.

Cheers,
HT
by Ha Tran
Thu Nov 05, 2015 1:03 am
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: Purchase Requisition Release Value of Characteristics blanc
Replies: 5
Views: 3615

Re: Purchase Requisition Release Value of Characteristics blanc

Hi, It is unfortunate that the release strategy functionality requires the full matching of all assigned release characteristic values and therefore, if you are using the cost centre as part of your release procedure, you have to make sure all possible cost centre values shall be assigned to related...
by Ha Tran
Tue Oct 13, 2015 5:32 pm
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: Buget committed when Purchase Order Released
Replies: 1
Views: 1583

Re: Buget committed when Purchase Order Released

Hi,

To my best knowledge and understanding, it is not feasible as the commitment will be initiated once the PO is generated. As a result of it, a work-around solution can be deployed where the actual cost object will be updated during PO release.

Cheers,
HT
by Ha Tran
Sun Oct 04, 2015 9:56 pm
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: Tax condition print on PO output
Replies: 3
Views: 2271

Re: Tax condition print on PO output

Hi,

You can include the new custom logic in your existing print-out program instead of looking at the output type change.

Cheers,
HT
by Ha Tran
Thu Oct 01, 2015 7:14 pm
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: How to select only maintained RFQ's in ME21N
Replies: 1
Views: 1360

Re: How to select only maintained RFQ's in ME21N

Hi,

I am afraid we are not finding any standard functionality which can cater for your business requirement as far as I am concerned.

Cheers,
HT
by Ha Tran
Thu Oct 01, 2015 5:53 pm
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: ERS [MRRL] - Company Code
Replies: 4
Views: 2929

Re: ERS [MRRL] - Company Code

Hi, To my best knowledge, SAP provided a standard BAdI MRM_ERS_HDAT_MODIFY (Method ERS_HEADERDATA_MODIFY) and User Exit EXIT_SAPLMRMH_001 (Enhancement MRMH0001) to enable the update of the document header data while the ERS invoices are processed. However, looking at the list of fields which are all...
by Ha Tran
Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:48 pm
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: Tax condition print on PO output
Replies: 3
Views: 2271

Re: Tax condition print on PO output

Hi,

Did you use the standard print-out program and Sapscript Form? or custom program and Smartform? Perhaps, you should build such logic in the program or Smartform to cater for your business requirement.

Cheers,
HT
by Ha Tran
Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:40 pm
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: Freight cost vendor field
Replies: 3
Views: 1985

Re: Freight cost vendor field

Hi, The vendor maintenance for the freight costs condition type shall be carried out at the PO item details level (instead of Header). Secondly, even if the freight vendor is not maintained in the PO, you can manually change the invoicing party when you settle the invoice for freight costs via MIRO ...
by Ha Tran
Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:38 pm
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: ERS [MRRL] - Company Code
Replies: 4
Views: 2929

Re: ERS [MRRL] - Company Code

Hi, Cross-company-code posting allowance represents for the fact that you can purchase the goods and services against a company code (A, for instance) but the procurement costs are charged to another company code (B, for instance). It does not mean the PO was raised against a company code (A, for in...
by Ha Tran
Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:32 pm
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: PO Line Item does not have PR - how to add PR no
Replies: 1
Views: 1777

Re: PO Line Item does not have PR - how to add PR no

Hi,

Have you already carried out the GR for your PO line item 30? Did you get the same error if you manually add the new line item to the same PO by adopting (drag and drop) the related PR number (and line item number)?

Cheers,
HT
by Ha Tran
Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:28 pm
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: Wrong tax code in ERS
Replies: 1
Views: 1263

Re: Wrong tax code in ERS

Hi,

The ERS invoices are usually picking up the default tax code from the PO. Can you provide additional clarification of when and how your system behaved differently randomly?

Cheers,
HT
by Ha Tran
Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:25 pm
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: Expense PO sloc mandatory
Replies: 2
Views: 1773

Re: Expense PO sloc mandatory

Hi, As far as the standard SAP functionalities are concerned, the field status of the PO can only be determined / configured at either one of the following levels - 1) PO Document Type; and/or 2) Transaction Code; and/or 3) Item Category Therefore, if you wish to control the ''Storage Location'' fie...
by Ha Tran
Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:20 pm
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: GR for non-valuated material does not raise stock quantity
Replies: 2
Views: 1826

Re: GR for non-valuated material does not raise stock quantity

Hi, At first, I guess you are not using 103 GR posting but related standard movement type which actually allows the receipted quantity to be placed into the chosen storage location (101, for instance). Secondly, did you check if the GR was carried out successfully? If yes, go back to your GR documen...