Search found 103 matches

by Donk
Wed Aug 09, 2017 12:21 pm
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: Plants using QM in a company code
Replies: 1
Views: 1418

Re: Plants using QM in a company code

I guess it depends on your definition of 'using QM'... - Check QALS to see which / any plants assigned to the CoCode have inspection lots - Check QMAT to see which / any plants have inspection types active - Check MAPL to see which / any plants have insp plans assigned to materials - Check QCC0 conf...
by Donk
Wed Aug 09, 2017 12:17 pm
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: 04 Inspection for Different Production Order Types
Replies: 2
Views: 1745

Re: 04 Inspection for Different Production Order Types

Hi Luke,

Take a look at EXIT_SAPLQPAP_002 (enhancement QPAP0002). That should allow you to dynamically assign the correct plan based on your custom logic.

Thanks and regards,
John
by Donk
Tue May 06, 2014 11:52 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: CWBQM QM Engineering Workbench
Replies: 2
Views: 1900

Re: CWBQM QM Engineering Workbench

I suppose it really depends on your end user / SME community, but (my opinion only) is that is not the most intuitive of transactions to use, and would require a significant amount of training. I wouldn't release it to all end users unless absolutely necessary, like for multiple spec maintenance, etc.
by Donk
Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:56 pm
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: QE51N - No Entries Found
Replies: 7
Views: 2939

Re: QE51N - No Entries Found

Generally the released (REL) status should indicate that it's available for results entry. The only other thing that comes to mind why you wouldn't see it in QE51N is authorization.... you may not have sufficient authority to record results against the lot. What happens if you pull up the lot in QA3...
by Donk
Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:01 pm
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: QE51N - No Entries Found
Replies: 7
Views: 2939

Re: QE51N - No Entries Found

That status seems like it should work. Check your selection criteria in QE51N to see if there are any conflicts there (also check dynamic selections). What happens if you run QA32 for the material / order number?

Regards,
John
by Donk
Mon Mar 03, 2014 8:11 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: Control of what Notification Codes are selectable
Replies: 1
Views: 926

Re: Control of what Notification Codes are selectable

Hello,

For the shared materials, does the option to specify a catalog profile at the material level (QM view) resolve any issues?

Regards,
John
by Donk
Thu Feb 27, 2014 1:51 pm
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: quality certificate in QC20 issue
Replies: 4
Views: 1775

Re: quality certificate in QC20 issue

Another potential option - in the config settings for the batch where used list, set each site to have synchronous posting of batch were used records active. The cert profiles could then be set up to use standard production chain functions for the results & spec origins

Regards,
John
by Donk
Thu Feb 27, 2014 8:24 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: QE51N - No Entries Found
Replies: 7
Views: 2939

Re: QE51N - No Entries Found

Hi,

Can't really recommend anything to reverse the UD on the lot. Since it looks like an 03 lot, I think your options are pretty limited.... cancelling the production order and starting with a fresh one might be the easiest approach.
by Donk
Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:48 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: QE51N - No Entries Found
Replies: 7
Views: 2939

Re: QE51N - No Entries Found

Hi, QE51N will only return inspection lots that are eligible for results entry. The status on your lot (specifically 'UD') indicates that the usage decision has been made, and no additional results may be recorded. If you need to see the lot to get results, etc., use t-code QA32 / QA33 instead of QE...
by Donk
Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:45 pm
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: QM Table link
Replies: 1
Views: 1109

Re: QM Table link

Hi,

I'd recommend BAPI_INSPOPER_GETDETAIL

Regards,
John
by Donk
Mon Oct 07, 2013 12:30 pm
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: Scientific Numbers in Results recording
Replies: 4
Views: 1754

Re: Scientific Numbers in Results recording

Hello Paul, It seems to work ok in our system using the same input you suggested... This is purely speculation, as I don't recall previous behavior, but I guess this may have been part of the settings for 'Input Processing' and original values in 4.7? In my test I used 1.151E2 as the entered result,...
by Donk
Wed Aug 21, 2013 6:59 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: Closing an insp-lot with Actual-lot-qty > Inp-lot-qt
Replies: 3
Views: 1599

Re: Closing an insp-lot with Actual-lot-qty > Inp-lot-qt

Hi,

First check note 48815 (ZQEVAC20) and see if that resolves the inconsistency
by Donk
Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:07 pm
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: Results recording via QM IDI Interface
Replies: 4
Views: 3415

Re: Results recording via QM IDI Interface

Hi,

Can you test to see if setting QAISR-KZLPROBE on your record to see if that makes any difference?

Regards,
John
by Donk
Fri Mar 22, 2013 9:59 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: Control inspection lot.
Replies: 2
Views: 1470

Re: Control inspection lot.

Hi,

Only way I know is if you transfer the stock that has already posted to another storage location. Upon the 4th GR to the original storage location, it should kick out another lot.

Regards,
John