Search found 20 matches

by AKelly
Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:26 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: Production Planning & Execution course
Replies: 1
Views: 1082

Production Planning & Execution course

Hi all, I know this is the QM board, but a lot of you have some cross functional knowledge in PP, or just have various knowledge of SAP classes in general. I would like to take the SCM 240 (PP and Execution) course offered by SAP but they don't have any times scheduled for 2014. I need the training ...
by AKelly
Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:13 am
Forum: Education Services/Training/Certification
Topic: SAP Production Planning & Execution training
Replies: 1
Views: 3729

SAP Production Planning & Execution training

Hi all, I would like to take the SCM 240 course offered by SAP but they don't have any times scheduled for 2014. I need the training within the first 2 months of 2014 - does anyone have any recommendations for other vendors that offer similiar training? I need hands on learning for functionality, co...
by AKelly
Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:41 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: QM inspection lots with Co-Products scenario
Replies: 7
Views: 4214

Re: QM inspection lots with Co-Products scenario

Thanks Craig. I was also thinking through some options and working with our PP person to figure something out. We are also looking at possibly doing a collective orders approach with some development. Currently, standard collective orders doesnt allow GR against the original orders...so that wouldn'...
by AKelly
Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:29 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: Digital Signature in Notifications
Replies: 0
Views: 933

Digital Signature in Notifications

I have a change management process that is built around a custom workflow and digital signatures. The signature strategy is asynchronous where we have 1 signature then a 2nd signature and that is enough to complete the strategy and move on. However, even after both signatures are completed, I get an...
by AKelly
Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:21 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: Action Box within Quality Notification error
Replies: 4
Views: 2233

Re: Action Box within Quality Notification error

It's very frustrating trying to unravel others "designs" and figure out how to make them work. "Lucikly" for me, on this gig I was brought in right before the initial go live (before the merger) and had to figure out what exactly was done. And for several months during go live support watching all t...
by AKelly
Wed Sep 25, 2013 8:36 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: Action Box within Quality Notification error
Replies: 4
Views: 2233

Re: Action Box within Quality Notification error

Providing a follow up because it's a rare situation so it may be useful if anyone gets stuck like this. The client I am working with has gone live at a few plants and then got acquired. The new parent co runs SAP already, so we are migrating them to the parent platform. Well, since the parent is alr...
by AKelly
Wed Sep 25, 2013 8:22 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: QM inspection lots with Co-Products scenario
Replies: 7
Views: 4214

Re: QM inspection lots with Co-Products scenario

LOL well "end user simplicity" and "simplicity for me" are two different things! I have years to go to get to an expert level, but through the 4 years of projects I have found several items I wish were standard, but I will graciously stayed employed and keep these items in my pocket :) For the co-pr...
by AKelly
Tue Sep 24, 2013 5:45 pm
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: False stock posting from QA11!!!
Replies: 7
Views: 3182

Re: False stock posting from QA11!!!

After a couple more weeks of testing, we have in fact found that this setting done on the storage type (as explained in my earlier post) fixed what we needed. Actually, on the insp lot- even with HUM active, SPCO is updated to show stock posting complete. Also, Craig, we found that with IM/WM/QM/HUM...
by AKelly
Tue Sep 24, 2013 1:55 pm
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: QM inspection lots with Co-Products scenario
Replies: 7
Views: 4214

Re: QM inspection lots with Co-Products scenario

Early lot release does work, but 04 inspections don't seem to support partial lots whereas the 03 does. Ugh, why can't everything be simple!
by AKelly
Mon Sep 23, 2013 4:37 pm
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: QM inspection lots with Co-Products scenario
Replies: 7
Views: 4214

QM inspection lots with Co-Products scenario

Hi all, At my client, they have a combined order/family molding production scenario. I know the DIMP solution has combined order functionality, but unfortunately, we can't activate the DIMP solution in this environment. We are testing a solution using co-products, but when we release the order, we g...
by AKelly
Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:14 pm
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: Duplicated Mter Inspection Char
Replies: 2
Views: 1204

Re: Duplicated Mter Inspection Char

Is the status of your MIC in QS23 Released?
by AKelly
Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:16 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: Action Box within Quality Notification error
Replies: 4
Views: 2233

Action Box within Quality Notification error

I have a custom action box that has been defined but it's tied to a standard ECM function module (Create ECR - FM: CCNO_CREATE_ECR) and when I click on the action box I receive an error message that says Transaction QM01 QM02 not supported. Have I missed a step in configuration where this FM needs t...
by AKelly
Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:10 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: False stock posting from QA11!!!
Replies: 7
Views: 3182

Re: False stock posting from QA11!!!

Thanks Craig. I did check yesterday with WM and we tested a config change. In the storage types for that warehouse, we selected "Propose post. change at sotrage bin" so it will perform the movement automatically. We are still setting up this system so once we get some production GR's in the system, ...
by AKelly
Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:13 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: False stock posting from QA11!!!
Replies: 7
Views: 3182

Re: False stock posting from QA11!!!

I'm actually having a similiar issue. Scenario is WM, QM, and HUM are all active. When making the UD, you also have the "Inspect for HU" setting setup in the insp type 04, so each HU can be sent to unrestricted or blocked, etc. Well, users will mark the HU as "post to unrestricted", apply UD code, a...
by AKelly
Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:08 am
Forum: Logistics QM
Topic: Force inspection completion
Replies: 3
Views: 2479

Re: Force inspection completion

Just following up. Passing an 'X' for field KZLPROBE marks that characteristic as "closed" and no further chars are expected*(see note) so the short term characteristic flag is set to 0. *Note: just b/c the KZLPROBE is passed, you can STILL create additional inspection points and record results.